However, given that NBC tape delayed everything, they had a large amount of leeway to tune what they programmed based on the results they already knew. In this case, making events where the US won a medal more prominent might help increase ratings.
Conveniently, wikipedia lists all the results, and has a nice set of tables about how the US did. So the question is: did the women's events produce more medals per participant than the men's events did?
To get a reasonable answer, I simply counted the number of medals won (split by type) per sport category, and divided by the number of participants in that category. There are some complications with this method. First, team events produce a higher fraction, so doing well in team events helps. I've included each team member as a separate medal, and after some minor research, include the team members who didn't participate in the final. I had them excluded on the first pass, but looking around it seems like those team members do get a medal as well. This doesn't change the final numbers by much (mostly it just bumps swimming up even more). Second, this ignores the Biles/Ledecky/Phelps effect, where one person dominates a sport heavily. Still, normalizing by total participants ensures that it's not just a case of flooding a sport with lots of people, and winning that way.
So the results are:
Full sample average at 44.6%. |
Full sample average at 51%. |
I also don't remember seeing any basketball, but that might have been sent to one of the other channels, and not the main NBC. It's also possible based on the score differentials, that NBC just decided that those would be very boring games to watch, and skipped them for that reason.
No comments:
Post a Comment